Sometimes it was possible for there to be a scroll event before the initial
pagination completed, which then upset the rest of the test. Just give it a few
ms to sort itself out instead.
It turns out that Chrome now implements scroll-anchoring itself (ie, content
stays in the same place when you add more stuff off-screen), which means we
cannot rely on back-pagination to make ScrollPanel do a scroll.
Instead, just do a scrollToToken. Which turns out to be considerably simpler
anyway.
This stops react-sdk from tracking any state previously stored for the purposes of enabling or disabling the lab feature that enabled the new MessageComposer. It is now enabled permanently.
This is being done with the hope that we can get more feedback for it so that when we release we can be confident that people will be OK with the changes it brings.
When sending the letter "a" we expect it to be sent as a text message when RTE is enabled because we now detect that there is no formatting or styled blocks in the composer. We also expect emoji to be sent as plaintext if there is no formatting
Mostly this is just making it look at the `view` state rather than the
individual boolean flags.
One other tweak merits explanation: we now implement the initial
couldn't-register-as-guest login with an explicit switch to the LOGIN view,
which means that the URL gets updated to #/login.
Treat the waitTime passed into `flush` as a timeout rather than a
time-between-loops, so that we can pass in bigger times and not slow the tests
down too much.
Bump the timeout when waiting for /publicRooms and /initialSync in the joining
test.
This used to exist to reproduce the functionality in the window.onload handler
in vector/index.js -- which got removed in 31915db. Having it here is confusing
at best.
Try to make it a bit more obvious what's been going on in mock-request: add
timestamps to lines, and an identifier so that where we have two flushes in
parallel, we can see what's what.
* Do we show the last room correctly on resume?
* Do we show the home page if we have no last room?
* If we follow a login link, and re-log-in, do we correctly vape the
mx_last_room_id (#4283)
To work around the fact that we now do more trips around the
event loop to update view state (because of going vis the store).
Also add comment saying how horrible this is.
The q.delay is needed to make sure (or at least reasonably
sure...) that the login component has appeared by that point. The
done handler needs to be the error callback too otherwise failures
result in timeouts rather than the actual failure.
This time the test wasn't being flaky, but it does inspect a lot of the internal of RoomView, which has had some modifications recently. I've updated the test to reflect this and it passes locally.
Also, fix a bug in HomePage with an undeclared "error" which should be "err".
Let's see what Travis thinks of this!
