imterah/element-portable
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Rewrite doesRoomOrThreadHaveUnreadMessages to use the receipt rewrite from js-sdk (#11903)

Browse source 
* Rewrite doesRoomOrThreadHaveUnreadMessages to use the receipt rewrite from js-sdk

* Remove unit tests that rely on receipt timestamps

Previously, if we found a receipt for an unknown event, we would use the
receipt timestamp and declare all events before that time to be read.
Now, we ignore such "dangling" receipts until we find the event they
refer to.

This new behaviour is more correct, but does lead to more messages being
considered unread.

This commit deletes tests that checked for the old behaviour.

* Check for a missing thread in determineUnreadState

* Fix incorrect way to find room timeline

* More realistic test setup to support new receipt code

* Update snapshot to expect a room to be unread when there are no receipts

* Formatting fixes

* Update snapshot to show menu and notif button

* Disable some flaky tests

* Disable some flaky tests

* Fix test to make a threaded receipt for an event that is actually in the thread

---------

Co-authored-by: Florian Duros <florianduros@element.io>
Co-authored-by: Florian Duros <florian.duros@ormaz.fr>
This commit is contained in:
Andy Balaam 2023-11-29 13:36:52 +00:00 • committed by GitHub
parent e207798a8f
commit 8b7f49e74e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
11 changed files with 230 additions and 234 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

11
cypress/e2e/read-receipts/new-messages.spec.ts
View file

@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
assertRead(room2);
});
// XXX: fails because the room remains unread even though I sent a message
// Note: this test should not re-use the same MatrixClient - it
// should create a new one logged in as the same user.
it.skip("Me sending a message from a different client marks room as read", () => {
// Given I have unread messages
goTo(room1);
@ -345,8 +347,7 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
// Then thread does appear unread
assertUnreadThread("Msg1");
});
// XXX: fails because the room is still "bold" even though the notification counts all disappear
it.skip("Marking a room with unread threads as read makes it read", () => {
it("Marking a room with unread threads as read makes it read", () => {
// Given I have an unread thread
goTo(room1);
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1"), threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp2")]);
@ -358,8 +359,7 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
// Then the room is read
assertRead(room2);
});
// XXX: fails for the same reason as "Marking a room with unread threads as read makes it read"
it.skip("Sending a new thread message after marking as read makes it unread", () => {
it("Sending a new thread message after marking as read makes it unread", () => {
// Given a thread exists
goTo(room1);
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1"), threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp2")]);
@ -374,8 +374,7 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
// Then the room becomes unread
assertUnread(room2, 1);
});
// XXX: fails for the same reason as "Marking a room with unread threads as read makes it read"
it.skip("Sending a new different-thread message after marking as read makes it unread", () => {
it("Sending a new different-thread message after marking as read makes it unread", () => {
// Given 2 threads exist, and Thread2 has the latest message in it
goTo(room1);
receiveMessages(room2, ["Thread1", "Thread2", threadedOff("Thread1", "t1a")]);