Adjust tests to use new behaviour

This commit is contained in:
Kegan Dougal 2024-09-13 13:45:40 +01:00
parent df7bb61a5b
commit 7fbac10490
2 changed files with 16 additions and 46 deletions

View file

@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
it("creates a new list based on the key", async () => {
const listKey = "key";
mocked(slidingSync.getListParams).mockReturnValue(null);
mocked(slidingSync.setList).mockResolvedValue("yep");
await manager.ensureListRegistered(listKey, {
sort: ["by_recency"],
});
@ -114,7 +113,6 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
mocked(slidingSync.getListParams).mockReturnValue({
ranges: [[0, 42]],
});
mocked(slidingSync.setList).mockResolvedValue("yep");
await manager.ensureListRegistered(listKey, {
ranges: [[0, 52]],
});
@ -128,7 +126,6 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
ranges: [[0, 42]],
sort: ["by_recency"],
});
mocked(slidingSync.setList).mockResolvedValue("yep");
await manager.ensureListRegistered(listKey, {
ranges: [[0, 42]],
sort: ["by_recency"],
@ -139,11 +136,9 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
});
describe("startSpidering", () => {
it("requests in batchSizes", async () => {
it("requests in expanding batchSizes", async () => {
const gapMs = 1;
const batchSize = 10;
mocked(slidingSync.setList).mockResolvedValue("yep");
mocked(slidingSync.setListRanges).mockResolvedValue("yep");
mocked(slidingSync.getListData).mockImplementation((key) => {
return {
joinedCount: 64,
@ -153,12 +148,13 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
await manager.startSpidering(batchSize, gapMs);
// we expect calls for 10,19 -> 20,29 -> 30,39 -> 40,49 -> 50,59 -> 60,69
const wantWindows = [
[10, 19],
[20, 29],
[30, 39],
[40, 49],
[50, 59],
[60, 69],
[0, 10],
[0, 20],
[0, 30],
[0, 40],
[0, 50],
[0, 60],
[0, 70],
];
expect(slidingSync.getListData).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(wantWindows.length);
expect(slidingSync.setList).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
@ -170,13 +166,12 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
SlidingSyncManager.ListSearch,
// eslint-disable-next-line jest/no-conditional-expect
expect.objectContaining({
ranges: [[0, batchSize - 1], range],
ranges: [range],
}),
);
return;
}
expect(slidingSync.setListRanges).toHaveBeenCalledWith(SlidingSyncManager.ListSearch, [
[0, batchSize - 1],
range,
]);
});
@ -184,7 +179,6 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
it("handles accounts with zero rooms", async () => {
const gapMs = 1;
const batchSize = 10;
mocked(slidingSync.setList).mockResolvedValue("yep");
mocked(slidingSync.getListData).mockImplementation((key) => {
return {
joinedCount: 0,
@ -198,31 +192,7 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
SlidingSyncManager.ListSearch,
expect.objectContaining({
ranges: [
[0, batchSize - 1],
[batchSize, batchSize + batchSize - 1],
],
}),
);
});
it("continues even when setList rejects", async () => {
const gapMs = 1;
const batchSize = 10;
mocked(slidingSync.setList).mockRejectedValue("narp");
mocked(slidingSync.getListData).mockImplementation((key) => {
return {
joinedCount: 0,
roomIndexToRoomId: {},
};
});
await manager.startSpidering(batchSize, gapMs);
expect(slidingSync.getListData).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(slidingSync.setList).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(slidingSync.setList).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
SlidingSyncManager.ListSearch,
expect.objectContaining({
ranges: [
[0, batchSize - 1],
[batchSize, batchSize + batchSize - 1],
[0, batchSize],
],
}),
);
@ -277,7 +247,7 @@ describe("SlidingSyncManager", () => {
const unstableSpy = jest
.spyOn(client, "doesServerSupportUnstableFeature")
.mockImplementation(async (feature: string) => {
expect(feature).toBe("org.matrix.msc3575");
expect(feature).toBe("org.matrix.simplified_msc3575");
return true;
});
const proxySpy = jest.spyOn(manager, "getProxyFromWellKnown").mockResolvedValue("https://proxy/");